UN Emergency Peace Service
letter to Congress, Dec. 2007

December 3, 2007
Dear Member of Congress,

We, the undersigned organizations, write in support of H. Res. 213, the resolution calling for the
establishment of a United Nations Emergency Peace Service (UNEPS) capable of intervening in
the early stages of crimes against humanity or other humanitarian crises. We urge you to cosponsor and work for passage of the resolution with its champions, Representatives Albert Wynn (D-MD) and James Walsh (R-NY).

In recent years, the international community has been increasingly called upon to respond rapidly and effectively to emerging crises, yet lacks the tools to consistently answer this call. We believe the time has come for a permanent emergency response service, designed to complement the capacity of the United Nations to provide stability, peace, and relief in deadly emergencies. As envisioned, UNEPS would individually recruit, train and employ 12,000 - 18,000 personnel with a wide range of skills, including civilian police, military, judicial experts and relief
professionals. This ensures that missions would not fail due to a lack of skills, equipment,
cohesiveness, experience in resolving conflicts, or gender, national or religious imbalance. The
Service could have special expertise in peacekeeping, conflict resolution, environmental crisis
response and emergency medical relief. Upon Security Council authorization,

UNEPS would be immediately available to respond to a crisis, with first in – first out capabilities.
By intervening in the early stages of urgent situations, UNEPS could help prevent their
escalation into national or regional disasters. It is a tool that the international community
desperately needs in order to fulfill its “responsibility to protect.” Last spring, Chad’s
government requested a U.N. deployment of peacekeepers to slow the spillover of violence from
Darfur. However, while the U.N. struggled to prepare the mission, Chad’s government backed
away from the request.

UNEPS would also help to create a climate of stability so that confidence building measures can
take place. For example, on July 31, 2007 the United Nations Security Council unanimously
authorized the deployment of an African Union - U.N. hybrid peacekeeping force (UNAMID).
Unfortunately, reports indicate the UNAMID will not be fully operational until well after its
December 31, 2007 deadline. If UNEPS were currently in existence, peacekeepers could have
been on their way in days rather than months after the agreement, bringing greater stability to the region and perhaps forestalling a change of heart in Khartoum.

The job of building support and raising funds for each new U.N. peacekeeping mission has been
compared to that of a volunteer fire chief who is forced to raise funds, find volunteers and secure
a fire truck for each new fire. The U.N.’s goals for “rapid deployment” are 30 days for a
“traditional” peacekeeping mission (where all parties agree to allow in peacekeepers) and 90
days for “complex” missions (where spoilers attempt to derail a peace agreement). Unfortunately
the U.N. usually lacks the resources to meet these modest goals and will to need set the bar much higher to make an appreciable difference to the civilians caught in the crossfire of today’s
conflicts.

A United Nations Emergency Peace Service could save millions of lives and billions of dollars,
prevent small conflicts from growing into full-scale wars, and keep fragile states from becoming
failed states. It will also reduce the need to expend U.S. lives and resources while effectively
allowing others to share the burden. More than two-thirds of the American public supports the
U.N. having this capacity. We urge your serious consideration of this important proposal and
hope you will join us in support of H. Res. 213.

Sincerely,
    3D Security Initiative
    American Public Health Association
    Americans for Democratic Action, Inc. (ADA)
    Americans for Informed Democracy
    Amnesty International USA
    Better World Campaign
   Center for American Progress
   Center for International Policy
   Center for War/Peace Studies
   Centre for Development of International Law
   Church Women United
   Citizens for Global Solutions
   Civitatis International
   CivWorld
   COLEAD
   Community of Christ
   Council for a Livable World
   Democracy Coalition Project
   Earth Action
   ENOUGH
   Evangelical Lutheran Church in America
   Foreign Policy in Focus
   Fund for Peace
   Genocide Intervention Network
   Global Action to Prevent War
   Global Associates for Health Development
   Global Exchange
   Global Ministries of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) and United Church of
       Christ
   Global Security Institute
   Human Rights First
   Human Rights Watch
   International Crisis Group
   International Rescue Committee
   Lawyers' Committee on Nuclear Policy
   Maryknoll Global Concerns
   National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP)
   National Association of Social Workers
   National Peace Corps Association
   National Priorities Project
   NETWORK: A Catholic Social Justice Lobby
   Nuclear Age Peace Foundation
   Peace Action
   Physicians for Human Rights
   Presbyterian Church, (USA), Washington Office
   Rainbow/PUSH Coalition
   Refugees International
   Save Darfur
   Union of Concerned Scientists
   Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations
   United Church of Christ, Justice and Witness Ministries
   United Methodist Church, General Board of Church and Society
   United Nations Association of the USA
   Universal Human Rights Network
   Women’s Action for New Directions

For more information contact Don Kraus, Citizens for Global Solutions at
dkraus@globalsolutions.org or 202-330-4103. Info is also available online at
www.globalsolutions.org/UNEPS